Contents
pdf Download PDF pdf Download XML
410 Views
350 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 12 Issue 1 (None, 2018) | Pages 1 - 10
Performance of REMS in Predicting Sepsis Mortality in a Tertiary Care Emergency Setting
 ,
1
Casualty medical officer, Dept of Emergency & Trauma center, JNMCH AMU, Aligarh, UP, India
2
Professor, Dept of TB& Respiratory diseases, JNMCH AMU, Aligarh, UP, India
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Oct. 25, 2018
Revised
Oct. 30, 2018
Accepted
Nov. 7, 2018
Published
Nov. 27, 2018
Abstract

Background: Sepsis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in emergency and critical care settings, particularly in resource-limited countries like India. Early identification of high-risk patients is crucial for timely intervention and optimal resource utilization. The Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) is a simple, bedside physiological scoring system that may help predict mortality at the time of emergency department presentation.

Methods: This was a prospective observational study conducted in a tertiary care emergency department. A total of 166 adult patients with sepsis were enrolled and followed until discharge or death. REMS was calculated at presentation using six clinical parameters: age, heart rate, respiratory rate, mean arterial pressure, Glasgow Coma Scale, and oxygen saturation. Patients were categorized into survivors and non-survivors. ROC curve analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive accuracy of REMS. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of in-hospital mortality.

Results: Out of 166 patients, 108 (65.1%) survived and 58 (34.9%) died. Mean REMS score was significantly higher among non-survivors (11.1 ± 3.1) compared to survivors (6.4 ± 2.3), (p < 0.001). REMS demonstrated good predictive accuracy for in-hospital mortality with an AUC of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77–0.89). At a cut-off of REMS ≥10, sensitivity was 62.1%, specificity 88.9%, PPV 75.8%, NPV 81.4%, and overall accuracy 79.5%. On multivariate analysis, REMS (AOR: 1.39 per point increase, p < 0.001), septic shock at presentation (AOR: 3.46, p < 0.001), serum lactate (AOR: 1.57 per mmol/L, p < 0.001), and age (AOR: 1.31 per 10-year increase, p = 0.003) were independent predictors of mortality.

Conclusion: REMS is a simple, rapid, and reliable bedside tool for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis. Its good discriminatory ability and ease of application make it particularly useful for triage and risk stratification in busy and resource-limited emergency departments. Early use of REMS may help prioritize critically ill patients for aggressive management and intensive care admission.

Keywords
Recommended Articles
Research Article
Clinicopathological Features of Primary Renal Mesenchymal Neoplasms in Adults: A Cross-sectional Study
Published: 05/04/2025
Research Article
Scalp Nodules as the Presenting Sign of Occult High-Grade B-Cell Lymphoma: A Diagnostic Dilemma Amid Concurrent Infectious Illness
...
Published: 29/05/2026
Research Article
Lipoma Of The Labia Majora: A Case Report And Systematic Review Of The Literature
Published: 29/05/2026
Research Article
Congenital Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa: Multisystemic Complications in a Pediatric Patient
...
Published: 29/05/2026
© Copyright Spejalisci Dermatolodzy