Contents
pdf Download PDF pdf Download XML
2 Views
0 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 17 Issue 1 (Jan-Dec, 2024) | Pages 102 - 111
Analgesic Efficacy of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block versus Femoral Nerve Block before Spinal Anaesthesia for Hip Surgery: A Randomized Trial
1
Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, RIMT Medical College & Hospital, Mandi, Gobindgarh, Punjab
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
July 3, 2024
Revised
July 20, 2024
Accepted
Aug. 1, 2024
Published
Aug. 8, 2024
Abstract

Background

Positioning patients with painful hip fractures for spinal anaesthesia can be challenging. Femoral nerve block (FNB) provides analgesia but may incompletely cover hip capsular innervation and cause quadriceps weakness. The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block may provide more comprehensive, motor-sparing analgesia. This study compared the analgesic efficacy of PENG block and FNB before spinal anaesthesia for hip surgery.

Methods

This prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded trial included 76 adults undergoing hip surgery under spinal anaesthesia. Participants were allocated equally to receive ultrasound-guided PENG block or FNB using 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. Dynamic numerical rating scale (NRS) scores were recorded at baseline and 10, 20 and 30 minutes after block administration. The primary outcome was reduction in dynamic NRS at 30 minutes. Secondary outcomes included positioning pain and quality, spinal attempts, rescue fentanyl, postoperative analgesia, quadriceps weakness, ambulation and adverse events.

Results

Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. At 30 minutes, dynamic NRS was lower with PENG block than FNB (2.2±1.1 versus 3.8±1.4; p<0.001), with a greater reduction from baseline (6.1±1.2 versus 4.4±1.5; p<0.001). PENG block reduced positioning pain (2.5±1.2 versus 4.1±1.5; p<0.001) and positioning time (2.6±0.8 versus 3.8±1.1 minutes; p<0.001). Optimal positioning was more frequent (73.7% versus 44.7%; p=0.019), whereas rescue fentanyl use was lower (7.9% versus 31.6%; p=0.019). Time to first rescue analgesia was prolonged (8.9±2.6 versus 6.4±2.1 hours; p<0.001), and 24-hour tramadol consumption was reduced (71.1±45.8 versus 110.5±52.6 mg; p=0.001). Quadriceps weakness at 30 minutes occurred in 10.5% versus 42.1% of patients (p=0.004). Adverse events were comparable.

Conclusion

PENG block provided superior pre-spinal and postoperative analgesia, improved positioning conditions and better preserved quadriceps strength compared with FNB, without increasing complications.

Keywords
Recommended Articles
Research Article
Efficacy of Single-Site versus Two-Site Ultrasound-Guided Costoclavicular Block for Below-Elbow Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Study
Published: 08/10/2024
Research Article
Impact of Screen Time and Sleep Duration on Adults’ Body Mass Index– A Cross-Sectional Study
Published: 24/02/2025
Research Article
Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Extended-spectrum Beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from indoor patients of SRG Hospital, Jhalawar
...
Published: 04/06/2025
Research Article
Twenty-Nail Dystrophy from Lichen Planus: a late-stage diagnosis with severe damage. Brief report.
...
Published: 27/08/2026
© Copyright Spejalisci Dermatolodzy